UCI

Success: Kiplinger’s 100 Best Values in Public Colleges 2009-10

January 5th, 2010

On the UCLA Campus.

On the UCLA Campus.

I’m thrilled to say that UC campuses are part of Kiplinger’s 100 Best Values in Public Colleges for 2009-10.  According to Kiplinger, this is how they rank the schools:

We narrow the list to about 120 schools based on measures of academic quality — including SAT or ACT scores, admission and retention rates, student-faculty ratios, and four- and six-year graduation rates, which most schools reported for the class entering in 2002.

We then rank each school based on cost and financial aid. In our scoring system, academic quality carries more weight than costs (almost two-thirds of the total).

You can see the entire listing of their top 100 here on their site as well as the full description of how they rank the colleges here.

Here are the rankings for the UC’s:

#11: UCSD

#13: UCLA

#18: UC Berkeley

#20: UC Irvine

#29: UCSB (Still on the list but not as high as the above schools.  I’ll account it to all the beach-front property)

#41: UC Davis

#50: Cal Poly San Luis Obispo (Not a UC but still loving that another California school is on here)

#68 UCSC

xoxo, Vanesa

Your Campus: UC Fee Hikes raise 32%

November 19th, 2009

Students and labor-union activists rally at UCLA to protest a proposed increase in student fees in the University of California system. Police arrested 14 demonstrators. Protests were also held at several other UC campuses. (Barbara Davidson / Los Angeles Times / November 18, 2009)

Students and labor-union activists rally at UCLA to protest a proposed increase in student fees in the University of California system. Police arrested 14 demonstrators. Protests were also held at several other UC campuses. (Barbara Davidson / Los Angeles Times / November 18, 2009)

I want to avoid it but I can’t…I have to talk about the UC Fee Hikes.  I want to avoid it because it is disappointing and deeply complicated with roots in California’s severe economic crisis.  But I have to talk about it because the UC system is one of the greatest public institutions our country has and it is because of the UC system that people like me are able to be educated and self-sufficient from employment. 

Reading the LA Times this morning I learned that the increase comes to 32%.  The average student will have to pay $10,302 for base fees and $16,000 for room, board and books.  $26,302 for a public school education?!?!?!?!  Every month I write a check to pay my student loans and I feel the pain every.single.time.  I can’t even imagine what the class of 2015 will be looking at.  I still proudly stand behind our mantra, EDUCATION = EMPOWERMENT, and wish that the state of California would look deeper into our economic crisis to fix the root of our problems and not make cuts that will hurt our communities in the long run. 

The Opinion section of the LA Times had comments from students, professors, parents and community members that I found to be incredibly thought provoking.   Here are a few and I encourage you to  read the entire article here.

I teach mathematics at UCLA, and I can tell you the regents are making a huge mistake. I came here because UC is top research place that is also a PUBLIC university. After this fee hike, it can no longer be called public. Sacramento will agree and cut funding even more… and the cycle continues. I know of a quite a number of faculty colleagues who could go to a top private school with higher salaries whenever they want – but they like UC’s diversity and public nature (okay, and the weather). It is all but certain many will leave in the coming years. Furloughs and pay cuts we can deal with; transforming the greatest public university in the US, and one of the best in the world, into a middling private institution, we can’t.

Yesterday, the regents passed the capital budget. It’s paid for with bonds backed by… student fees. Yet, it doesn’t pay for renovating class rooms, or creating more quiet space to study, or to improve instruction. It pays for new stadiums and labs. Nothing against labs, but in the current crisis that’s just wrong. It tells the students “you are being had”.

I can only urge every Angelino who cares to come to the protest today and show the regents exactly what we think of their action.

Posted by: Christian Haesemeyer | November 19, 2009 at 07:07 AMThe question is far more complex than simply the cost of attendance. While the raw number can spark debates, we can’t forget that behind these numbers are countless lives. These are the parents who will be working one more job to pay for the tuition, the students who will have to take up more loans, the brother that may not go to college because of the tuition increase, and much more. Behind each number are countless stories, and that’s the disheartening fact.

While the tuition may not be as high as private universities, but we are neglecting the fact that it is a public institution. A public institution cannot be compared with private institutions because they draw from significantly different sources of income. As a public institution, 26k is simply too much. I think I will end it at that.

Posted by: UCB Student | November 18, 2009 at 10:21 PMAs a recent graduate of UC Berkeley who’s now paying $66,000 a year for a private medical school education, I definitely still think my tuition was a bargain. While the pain of a fee hike isn’t evenly distributed, and I certainly know and feel for those students who are hardest hit, it’s still one of the best educations around for a relatively low price. My degree earns respect universally, and whether students pay what I paid or $26,000 a year, that’s still less than half the cost of the ivy-league educations that many of my new classmates paid for. And now, so much more than before, I’m being forced to evaluate the risks and rewards of going into extreme student debt in exchange for the knowledge and training school provides. I’m betting my entire financial future that the investment will pay off. In a world where you often get nothing more than what you pay for, it seems somewhat petty for students to claim entitlement to a world-class education without being willing to bet on their school.

Posted by: a California Golden Bear | November 18, 2009 at 07:03 PM 

Your Campus: UC Walkouts

September 25th, 2009

Students at UC Berkeley protest against cuts. From SFgate.com

Students at UC Berkeley protest against cuts. From SFgate.com

On Thursday UC Campuses faced demonstrations from students and staff against University budget cuts and proposed fee increases.  I understand that our entire country is facing an economic crisis but I have never ever believed that the place to cut is in our schools.  In the Campus Confidant mantra it reads that EDUCATION = EMPOWERMENT.  The beauty of the UC system is that it provides both education and empowerment to a polyglot of ethnicities, communities, financial brackets and more.  There is so much I wish to say but I don’t think I could improve upon Gavin Newsom’s post in the Huffington Post.  Here are a few of the highlights from his post entitled “LET’S GET OUR PRIORITIES STRAIGHT”.  The entire post can be read at The Huffington Post.

UC Berkeley will be eliminating approximately one out of every ten courses this coming year. UC San Francisco will potentially have to reduce their faculty by fourteen percent because of the recent cuts. UCLA has reduced support to research centers by fifty percent. UC Irvine has completely stopped admitting students into their education program.

All across the state, we are choking off opportunity for hundreds of thousands of young Californians to build a better life for themselves and a better future for California.

Let me be clear: I favor fully funding the UC system. Cannibalizing our state’s future through cuts to education is the exact opposite of the kind of reform and long-term thinking we need from our leaders in Sacramento.

We have a system in California that discourages thoughtful budget and financial planning, requiring a two-thirds majority every year to pass a budget that paralyzes our state. We have a complex web of ballot initiatives that further complicates the process.

Walkouts like the one currently planned will become more frequent unless we undertake systemic reforms and truly take California in a new direction.

We need to convene a constitutional convention and get serious about changes to the system. Until we do, we’re jeopardizing our ability to be competitive in the global economy. Preparing our children for success in the 21st century necessitates investment in higher education not cuts to it.

In San Francisco, we have a robust rainy day fund. We drew down on our reserves to make sure not a single teacher in San Francisco was laid off when the recession hit. We created a partnership between SFSU, the school district, and the city to guarantee a college education to every public school 6th grader who wants one. And if their families can’t afford tuition, we help with that too.

We operate with a limited budget in San Francisco, just like the state. But we managed to keep teachers in the classroom and promise every student a chance to go to college. We didn’t raise taxes — we reformed the budget process and used resources in a smarter way.

It’s time to shake up the system that’s put our state in this mess. We need come together to fundamentally rethink how we govern California.

I haven’t gotten too far into my research for the next California gubernatorial election but I can’t deny that Gavin Newsom has a point here.  To follow follow Gavin Newsom on Twitter click here.

xoxo peace and love, Vanesa

 

 

UC Berkeley will be eliminating approximately one out of every ten courses this coming year. UC San Francisco will potentially have to reduce their faculty by fourteen percent because of the recent cuts. UCLA has reduced support to research centers by fifty percent. UC Irvine has completely stopped admitting students into their education program.

All across the state, we are choking off opportunity for hundreds of thousands of young Californians to build a better life for themselves and a better future for California.

And it’s our fault. We’ve allowed our system of governance to de-fund and de-prioritize higher education, putting our state’s economic future in jeopardy.

Let me be clear: I favor fully funding the UC system. Cannibalizing our state’s future through cuts to education is the exact opposite of the kind of reform and long-term thinking we need from our leaders in Sacramento.

But the current resource-constrained situation forces us to make difficult choices about our shared priorities. We must protect our environment, provide universal health care and invest in infrastructure development. And therein lies our statewide dilemma.

We have a system in California that discourages thoughtful budget and financial planning, requiring a two-thirds majority every year to pass a budget that paralyzes our state. We have a complex web of ballot initiatives that further complicates the process.

Walkouts like the one currently planned will become more frequent unless we undertake systemic reforms and truly take California in a new direction.

We need to convene a constitutional convention and get serious about changes to the system. Until we do, we’re jeopardizing our ability to be competitive in the global economy. Preparing our children for success in the 21st century necessitates investment in higher education not cuts to it.

In San Francisco, we have a robust rainy day fund. We drew down on our reserves to make sure not a single teacher in San Francisco was laid off when the recession hit. We created a partnership between SFSU, the school district, and the city to guarantee a college education to every public school 6th grader who wants one. And if their families can’t afford tuition, we help with that too.

We operate with a limited budget in San Francisco, just like the state. But we managed to keep teachers in the classroom and promise every student a chance to go to college. We didn’t raise taxes — we reformed the budget process and used resources in a smarter way.

It’s time to shake up the system that’s put our state in this mess. We need come together to fundamentally rethink how we govern California.

Read more at: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/gavin-newsom/lets-get-our-priorities-s_b_297374.html

Sarah from UC Davis saw her tuition increase almost ten percent, while her mother, a state employee, just took a 15 percent pay cut.

Read more at: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/gavin-newsom/lets-get-our-priorities-s_b_297374.html

With the upcoming University of California walkout, we asked our Facebook community recently how the impending UC and CSU cuts were affecting them. The response was overwhelming:

Stephanie from SF State needed only two classes to graduate with her bachelor’s degree. But one of the courses was eliminated — graduation will have to wait until next year.

A mother from the East Bay worried that her daughter couldn’t enroll in a single class she needs and is about to lose her student status, her financial aid, and health insurance.

Sarah from UC Davis saw her tuition increase almost ten percent, while her mother, a state employee, just took a 15 percent pay cut.

UC Berkeley will be eliminating approximately one out of every ten courses this coming year. UC San Francisco will potentially have to reduce their faculty by fourteen percent because of the recent cuts. UCLA has reduced support to research centers by fifty percent. UC Irvine has completely stopped admitting students into their education program.

All across the state, we are choking off opportunity for hundreds of thousands of young Californians to build a better life for themselves and a better future for California.

And it’s our fault. We’ve allowed our system of governance to de-fund and de-prioritize higher education, putting our state’s economic future in jeopardy.

Let me be clear: I favor fully funding the UC system. Cannibalizing our state’s future through cuts to education is the exact opposite of the kind of reform and long-term thinking we need from our leaders in Sacramento.

But the current resource-constrained situation forces us to make difficult choices about our shared priorities. We must protect our environment, provide universal health care and invest in infrastructure development. And therein lies our statewide dilemma.

We have a system in California that discourages thoughtful budget and financial planning, requiring a two-thirds majority every year to pass a budget that paralyzes our state. We have a complex web of ballot initiatives that further complicates the process.

Walkouts like the one currently planned will become more frequent unless we undertake systemic reforms and truly take California in a new direction.

We need to convene a constitutional convention and get serious about changes to the system. Until we do, we’re jeopardizing our ability to be competitive in the global economy. Preparing our children for success in the 21st century necessitates investment in higher education not cuts to it.

In San Francisco, we have a robust rainy day fund. We drew down on our reserves to make sure not a single teacher in San Francisco was laid off when the recession hit. We created a partnership between SFSU, the school district, and the city to guarantee a college education to every public school 6th grader who wants one. And if their families can’t afford tuition, we help with that too.

We operate with a limited budget in San Francisco, just like the state. But we managed to keep teachers in the classroom and promise every student a chance to go to college. We didn’t raise taxes — we reformed the budget process and used resources in a smarter way.

It’s time to shake up the system that’s put our state in this mess. We need come together to fundamentally rethink how we govern California.

Read more at: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/gavin-newsom/lets-get-our-priorities-s_b_297374.html

UC Berkeley will be eliminating approximately one out of every ten courses this coming year. UC San Francisco will potentially have to reduce their faculty by fourteen percent because of the recent cuts. UCLA has reduced support to research centers by fifty percent. UC Irvine has completely stopped admitting students into their education program.

All across the state, we are choking off opportunity for hundreds of thousands of young Californians to build a better life for themselves and a better future for California.

And it’s our fault. We’ve allowed our system of governance to de-fund and de-prioritize higher education, putting our state’s economic future in jeopardy.

Let me be clear: I favor fully funding the UC system. Cannibalizing our state’s future through cuts to education is the exact opposite of the kind of reform and long-term thinking we need from our leaders in Sacramento.

But the current resource-constrained situation forces us to make difficult choices about our shared priorities. We must protect our environment, provide universal health care and invest in infrastructure development. And therein lies our statewide dilemma.

We have a system in California that discourages thoughtful budget and financial planning, requiring a two-thirds majority every year to pass a budget that paralyzes our state. We have a complex web of ballot initiatives that further complicates the process.

Walkouts like the one currently planned will become more frequent unless we undertake systemic reforms and truly take California in a new direction.

We need to convene a constitutional convention and get serious about changes to the system. Until we do, we’re jeopardizing our ability to be competitive in the global economy. Preparing our children for success in the 21st century necessitates investment in higher education not cuts to it.

In San Francisco, we have a robust rainy day fund. We drew down on our reserves to make sure not a single teacher in San Francisco was laid off when the recession hit. We created a partnership between SFSU, the school district, and the city to guarantee a college education to every public school 6th grader who wants one. And if their families can’t afford tuition, we help with that too.

We operate with a limited budget in San Francisco, just like the state. But we managed to keep teachers in the classroom and promise every student a chance to go to college. We didn’t raise taxes — we reformed the budget process and used resources in a smarter way.

It’s time to shake up the system that’s put our state in this mess. We need come together to fundamentally rethink how we govern California.

Read more at: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/gavin-newsom/lets-get-our-priorities-s_b_297374.html

With the upcoming University of California walkout, we asked our Facebook community recently how the impending UC and CSU cuts were affecting them. The response was overwhelming:

Stephanie from SF State needed only two classes to graduate with her bachelor’s degree. But one of the courses was eliminated — graduation will have to wait until next year.

A mother from the East Bay worried that her daughter couldn’t enroll in a single class she needs and is about to lose her student status, her financial aid, and health insurance.

Sarah from UC Davis saw her tuition increase almost ten percent, while her mother, a state employee, just took a 15 percent pay cut.

UC Berkeley will be eliminating approximately one out of every ten courses this coming year. UC San Francisco will potentially have to reduce their faculty by fourteen percent because of the recent cuts. UCLA has reduced support to research centers by fifty percent. UC Irvine has completely stopped admitting students into their education program.

All across the state, we are choking off opportunity for hundreds of thousands of young Californians to build a better life for themselves and a better future for California.

And it’s our fault. We’ve allowed our system of governance to de-fund and de-prioritize higher education, putting our state’s economic future in jeopardy.

Let me be clear: I favor fully funding the UC system. Cannibalizing our state’s future through cuts to education is the exact opposite of the kind of reform and long-term thinking we need from our leaders in Sacramento.

But the current resource-constrained situation forces us to make difficult choices about our shared priorities. We must protect our environment, provide universal health care and invest in infrastructure development. And therein lies our statewide dilemma.

We have a system in California that discourages thoughtful budget and financial planning, requiring a two-thirds majority every year to pass a budget that paralyzes our state. We have a complex web of ballot initiatives that further complicates the process.

Walkouts like the one currently planned will become more frequent unless we undertake systemic reforms and truly take California in a new direction.

We need to convene a constitutional convention and get serious about changes to the system. Until we do, we’re jeopardizing our ability to be competitive in the global economy. Preparing our children for success in the 21st century necessitates investment in higher education not cuts to it.

In San Francisco, we have a robust rainy day fund. We drew down on our reserves to make sure not a single teacher in San Francisco was laid off when the recession hit. We created a partnership between SFSU, the school district, and the city to guarantee a college education to every public school 6th grader who wants one. And if their families can’t afford tuition, we help with that too.

We operate with a limited budget in San Francisco, just like the state. But we managed to keep teachers in the classroom and promise every student a chance to go to college. We didn’t raise taxes — we reformed the budget process and used resources in a smarter way.

It’s time to shake up the system that’s put our state in this mess. We need come together to fundamentally rethink how we govern California.

Read more at: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/gavin-newsom/lets-get-our-priorities-s_b_297374.html

CULTURE: Orange County Restaurant Week for UCI Campus Confidants

September 14th, 2009

Escape the chains of Student Center Food!!  Seen here is a delicious offering from Andrei's Conscious Cuisine and Cocktails, one of the many restaurants in Irvine participating in Orange County Restaurant Week.

Escape the chains of Student Center Food!! Seen here is a delicious offering from Andrei's Conscious Cuisine and Cocktails, one of the many restaurants in Irvine participating in Orange County Restaurant Week.

Someone once said to me, “LA is annoying because it’s a bunch of people desperately trying to be individuals and Orange County is annoying because it’s a bunch of people desperately trying to be the same.”  Well as a native Angelino I can fight the good fight for my city all day long.  As far as Orange County goes, I’ll let Orange County Restaurant Week do the fighting…because one look at the participating restaurants and you’ll see there is nothing desperate or the same at all.  The menus are prixe fixe for the restaurants and a lot of them offer $10 lunch items.  Let’s face it, after a steady diet of Top Ramen you can spend a little bit more and bring some culture to your life and flavor to your taste buds by heading to one of the restaurants.  You can learn more about Orange County Restaurant Week at their site here and check out the restaurants in the listing here.

xoxo peace and love, Vanesa

Related Posts with Thumbnails